Card image cap

Richard Hayden Black's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

0%
2018-2019
0%
2018
7%
2016-2017
0%
2016
0%
2015
0%
2014-2015
0%
2014
0%
2012
0%
2005
0%
2004
0%
2002
0%
2004-2005
100%
2003
100%
2002
100%
2001
100%
1978-1999
100%
2011-2012
97%
2018
90%
2018
94%
2017
94%
2017
95%
2016
92%
2016
98%
2015
94%
2014
91%
2013
94%
2012
77%
2005
100%
2002-2003
75%
2000-2001
73%
2000
83%
1999
69%
1998
80%
2018
80%
2018
81%
2017
81%
2017
82%
2017
82%
2017
81%
2016
81%
2016
83%
2015
83%
2015
64%
2014-2015
64%
2014-2015
78%
2014
78%
2014
57%
2013
57%
2013
0%
2013
0%
2013
95%
2012
95%
2012
48%
2012
48%
2012
59%
2012
59%
2012
77%
2012
77%
2012
77%
2012
77%
2012
77%
2005
77%
2005
52%
2004
52%
2004
77%
2003
77%
2003
80%
2002
80%
2002
75%
2001
75%
2001
73%
2000
73%
2000
82
1999
82
1999
0%
2000-2002
50%
2016
0%
2013
0%
2012
0%
2005
0
2004
0%
2003
0%
2001
100%
2016-2017
89%
2014-2015
100%
2013
100%
2004-2005
100%
2002-2003
94%
2001
82%
1999
79%
2019
76%
2018
100%
2018
100%
2017
76%
2017
70%
2016
71%
2016
81%
2015
75%
2014
65%
2013
78%
2012-2017
65%
2012
100%
2004-2014
20%
2019
17%
2018
23%
2017
33%
2017
0%
2016
20%
2015-2019
20%
2015-2019
14%
2015
25%
2014-2018
25%
2014-2018
50%
1999
100%
2016-2017
89%
2014-2015
100%
2013
100%
2004-2005
100%
2002-2003
94%
2001
82%
1999
92%
1999
22%
2004-2005
22%
2004-2005
22%
2004-2005
22%
2004-2005
19%
2019
19%
2019
22%
2018
22%
2018
22%
2018
22%
2018
16%
2017
16%
2017
20%
2017
20%
2017
22%
2016
22%
2016
23%
2016
23%
2016
25%
2015
25%
2015
22%
2015
22%
2015
19%
2014
19%
2014
25%
2014
25%
2014
0%
2012
0%
2012
11%
2005
11%
2005
13%
2004
13%
2004
0%
2004
0%
2003
0%
2002
18%
2001
18%
2001
20%
1999
20%
1999
29%
2003
50%
2016
0%
2013
0%
2012
0%
2005
0
2004
0%
2003
0%
2001
95%
2018-2019
100%
2016-2017
100%
2016-2017
89%
2014-2015
89%
2014-2015
100%
2013
100%
2013
100%
2004-2005
100%
2004-2005
100%
2002-2003
100%
2002-2003
94%
2001
94%
2001
82%
1999
82%
1999
79%
2019
79%
2019
79%
2019
100%
2018
76%
2018
76%
2018
100%
2018
100%
2017
76%
2017
76%
2017
100%
2017
71%
2016
71%
2016
70%
2016
70%
2016
81%
2015
81%
2015
75%
2014
75%
2014
65%
2013
65%
2013
78%
2012-2017
78%
2012-2017
65%
2012
65%
2012
100%
2004-2014
100%
2004-2014
arrow_upward